ReviewGenes2025
The Emergence of Artificial Intelligence-Guided Karyotyping: A Review and Reflection.
Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Automated karyotyping and structural anomaly detection through a hybrid multi-stage deep learning framework integrating chromosome detection, pairwise classification, and autoencoder-based analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Molecular Pathology, Artificial Intelligence, and New Technologies in Hematologic Diagnostics: Translational Opportunities and Practical Considerations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Artificial intelligence for risk assessment and outcome prediction in malignant haematology.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Application of chromosomal microarray analysis for prenatal diagnosis in 315 ultrasonically abnormal fetuses.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Thriving or Withering? Plant Molecular Cytogenetics in the First Quarter of the 21st Century.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cancer Cytogenetics: Deep Roots, New Branches in the Age of Omics.Cancer genomics & proteomicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has entered the medical subspecialty of cytogenetics with the recent introduction of AI-guided karyotyping into the clinical laboratory. Karyotyping is an essential component of the cytogenetic analysis process; however, it is both labor-intensive and time-consuming. The introduction of AI algorithms into karyotyping software streamlines this process to provide accurate and abundant auto-karyotyped images for laboratory professionals to review and, also, alters the paradigm for chromosome analysis. Herein, we provide an overview of the AI-guided karyotyping products currently available for clinical use, discuss their utilization in the cytogenetics laboratory, and highlight changes AI-guided karyotyping has brought for early users. Finally, we reflect on our own laboratory observations and experience to discuss issues and practices that may need to adapt to best utilize this promising new technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.