ArticleGenes2025
Phenotypic Characterization and Marker-Trait Association Analysis Using SCoT Markers in Chrysanthemum (
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure in Oil-Bearing Rose Genotypes Using Start Codon-Targeted (SCoT) Markers.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Augmenting plant-pollinator interactions to promote biodiversity and global food security.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Molecular insights into salinity tolerance in Thymus daenensis: Scot and ISSR marker discovery in polycross-derived genotypes.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Evaluation and DNA Fingerprints ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
methodsPhenotypic characterization of 12 traits (7 quantitative and 5 qualitative traits) was conducted alongside SCoT marker analysis to assess genetic diversity and perform marker-trait association analysis in 65 chrysanthemum accessions.
resultsQuantitative traits showed 14.81-26.43% variation (peduncle length most variable), while qualitative traits exhibited Shannon-Weiner indices of 0.23-2.28 (flower color most diverse). Phenotypic analyses consistently grouped accessions into two clusters. SCoT markers generated 160 bands (159 polymorphic; 6.957 bands/marker) with high PIC values (0.408-0.896). Molecular analyses also revealed two genetic groups, though with partial discordance to phenotypic clusters. Eight significant marker-trait associations were identified, linking SCoT28/3/30/31/35/20/14/36 to flowering duration, plant height, peduncle diameter, flower color, and pest resistance traits.
conclusionsThe study revealed substantial diversity in local chrysanthemum germplasm, with SCoT markers effectively capturing genetic variation. While phenotypic and molecular groupings showed partial mismatch, identified marker-trait associations (e.g., SCoT28 linked to flowering duration) provide practical tools for marker-assisted breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.