ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Arthroscopic Management of Medial or Rotational Ankle Instability: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRotational ankle instability (RAI), involving combined medial and lateral ligament insufficiency, is an increasingly recognized clinical entity. While open surgery has traditionally been the mainstay for treating deltoid ligament injuries, recent developments in arthroscopic techniques offer a minimally invasive alternative. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current evidence on the arthroscopic management of medial and rotational ankle instability, focusing on surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The search strategy included the following terms: ((rotation instability) OR (deltoid) OR (medial ankle instability)) AND (ankle arthrosc*). Eligible studies included adult patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of medial ankle instability with a mean 26.4 months follow-up and reported clinical outcomes. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 336 patients and 346 ankles.
resultsThe mean patient age was 32.6 ± 5.0 years, with 80.6% being male. MRI was the primary diagnostic tool across most studies. Ankle sprains were the most common cause of instability. Lateral ligament insufficiency was frequently associated with medial injuries, reported in all studies evaluating this parameter. All patients underwent prior conservative treatment (mean duration: 5.6 months). Surgical management involved all-inside arthroscopic repair using knotless suture anchors. Additional procedures were performed in 90% of studies, including osteophyte resection (33.3%) and microfracture (22.2%). The mean follow-up period was 26.4 months. The mean postoperative AOFAS score was 95.3, with return to sport generally achieved between 3 and 5 months. Complications were minimal, primarily consisting of superficial wound issues and transient nerve irritation; no major complications or revision surgeries were reported. DISCUSSION: Arthroscopic management of medial and rotational ankle instability is associated with excellent functional outcomes, low complication rates, and early return to sport. Compared to open procedures, arthroscopic techniques offer advantages including reduced soft tissue trauma, fewer wound complications, and the ability to address concomitant intra-articular lesions in a single session. Although technically demanding, this approach is particularly beneficial in athletic populations. However, high-quality prospective studies are still needed to validate these findings and establish long-term comparative outcomes with open reconstruction techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.