ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Refined Procedure to Purify and Sequence Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Prostate Cancer.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid Biopsy in Advanced Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- Integrative Whole-Genome and Epigenome Profiling of cfDNA in Familial Prostate Cancer: Insights from a Pilot Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Accuracy of Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (niPGT) Compared to Invasive Embryo Biopsy.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA), a fragmented DNA circulating in blood, is a promising biomarker for cancer diagnosis and monitoring. Standardization of cfDNA isolation to enhance the sensitivity of molecular analyses in prostate cancer (PCa) is required. Towards this goal, we optimized existing methods to obtain a high quantity and quality of cfDNA from low volumes of plasma. The protocol was applied to samples from healthy males and three patient categories: radical prostatectomy (RP), disease-free (>6 years post-RP), and metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). The yield was significantly higher in mCRPC cases, and the size of fragments was shorter. We compared for the first time library preparation using two cfDNA inputs and low vs. high sequencing depth. Clonal events were observed irrespective of input and depth, but lower input showed more subclonal events. The clinical application of the refined protocols to cfDNA samples from an mCRPC patient showed no tumor fraction before RP, while it increased to 25% at the advanced stage. Among chromosomal changes and mutations, the androgen receptor gene amplification was detected. Altogether, this comprehensive study on improved cfDNA procedures is highly promising to enhance the quality of liquid biopsy-based research for discoveries and much-needed clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.