Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40565277›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Cardiovascular Toxicity of Metal-Based Nanoparticles.

Eun-Hye Kim, Sehyeon Park, Ok-Nam Bae

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eun-Hye KimCollege of Pharmacy, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, Republic of Korea.
Sehyeon ParkCollege of Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea.
Ok-Nam BaeCollege of Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0583-2116

Funding

Multi-Ministrial Research Project of Korea RS-2023-KH140699National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2022-NR070655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of nanotechnology has led to increased human exposure to metal-based nanoparticles (MNPs) through inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact, raising growing concerns on their potential health effects. Due to their nanoscale size and unique physicochemical properties, the MNPs can translocate from the initial exposure sites to the circulatory system and accumulate in the body. This review focuses on MNP-induced cardiovascular toxicity, highlighting its biodistribution, cytotoxic mechanisms, and pathological impact associated with various cardiovascular diseases. MNPs disrupt endothelial function, promote oxidative stress, and induce apoptosis and ferroptosis in cardiovascular cells. Furthermore, MNPs increase endothelial permeability, impair blood-brain barrier integrity, and enhance procoagulant activity, thereby contributing to vascular and cardiac dysfunction. The particles and their released metal ions play a synergistic role in mediating these toxic effects. Here, we focused on the effects of nano-sized particles while incorporating recent in vitro and in vivo studies that address the cardiovascular impacts and mechanisms of MNP-induced toxicity. This comprehensive review will help understand and explain the potentially toxic effects of MNPs on the cardiovascular system.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCardiovascular SystemMetal NanoparticlesAnimalsApoptosisBlood-Brain BarrierHumansOxidative Stresscardiovascular systemcardiovascular toxicitymetal-based nanoparticles (MNPs)nanoparticle

Identifiers

PMID40565277
PMCPMC12193294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.