ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Genomic Prediction and Heritability Estimation for Daughter Pregnancy Rate in U.S. Holstein Cows Using SNP, Epistasis and Haplotype Effects.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating Epistatic Interactions into Genomic Prediction of Growth and Fillet Fat Content in Common Carp.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The contributions of additive, dominance, haplotype, and epistasis effects up to the third order to the accuracy of predicting daughter pregnancy rate (DPR) phenotypic values and to the phenotypic variance in U.S. Holstein cows were investigated using five samples with 25,827-133,934 cows and 74,855-75,209 SNPs. Heritability estimates showed that only additive × additive (A × A) epistasis effects had nonzero heritability and all other second- and third-order epistasis effects had zero heritability, and hence A × A was the only epistasis effects included in the prediction models. Based on the results of the largest sample with 133,934 cows, genomic heritability estimate was 0.044-0.054 for additive heritability, 0.005 for dominance heritability, 0.011-0.022 for haplotype heritability, and 0.052-0.062 for A × A heritability. The combination of additive (A) and A × A effects was the best prediction model based on the prediction accuracy. This best model improved the prediction accuracy over the A-only model by 4.88%, and had total heritability of 0.099 as the summation of the additive and A × A heritability estimates. Dominance and haplotype effects had minor contributions (0.97-2.44%) to prediction accuracy in models without A × A effects but had no contribution to prediction accuracy when A × A was in the prediction model. The partition of A × A effects into inter- and intra-chromosome A × A effects showed that inter-chromosome A × A were mainly responsible for the A × A contributions to prediction accuracy and phenotypic variance. Sample size had a major impact on prediction accuracy and the sample of 90,000 cows or 81,000 cows per training population had peak prediction accuracies that were 32.70-35.85% higher than in the sample with 25,827 cows. The largest sample with 133,934 cows had the smallest variations in prediction accuracy and slightly lower average prediction accuracy than in the sample with 90,000 cows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.