ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Personalized High-Resolution Genetic Diagnostics of Prostate Adenocarcinoma Guided by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Results of a Pilot Study.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging biomarkers in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment: Insights into genetic, RNA and metabolic markers (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The upcoming wave of personalized medicine, driven by genomic diagnostics and artificial intelligence, demands clearly defined pre-laboratory and laboratory procedures to ensure the acquisition of DNA and RNA of sufficient quantity and quality. In prostate cancer oncogenetics, diagnostic and prognostic assessments increasingly rely on personalized approaches, including Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP). In this pilot study, we aimed to establish optimal pre-analytical and analytical conditions for selected genetic diagnostic methods using tissue samples acquired through multiparametric MRI-guided biopsy. Tissue specimens from thirteen patients were processed for DNA isolation, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Comparative analyses were performed on DNA derived from both fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. Sequencing quality metrics demonstrated markedly superior performance in fresh tissue compared to FFPE. These results highlight the importance of standardized tissue collection and processing protocols to enable reliable molecular diagnostics in prostate cancer. Our findings support the feasibility of integrating high-quality genomic testing into routine biopsy workflows and emphasize the need for further large-scale validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.