ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
XGB-BIF: An XGBoost-Driven Biomarker Identification Framework for Detecting Cancer Using Human Genomic Data.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- T lymphocyte regulatory cytokines predict frailty in older adults.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From imaging to omics: deep learning is bridging MRI and liquid biopsy in bone tumor diagnosis.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Review
- CLDN8 and ABCA12 define a shared molecular signature in ulcerative colitis-psoriasis comorbidity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Network toxicology & molecular docking: endocrine-disrupting chemicals induce prostate cancer - a system study.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2026Article
- EXO1 overexpression induces homologous recombination deficiency and enhances PARP inhibitor sensitivity in ER-positive breast cancer: modulation by N4BP2L2-Mediated restoration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human genome has a profound impact on human health and disease detection. Carcinoma (cancer) is one of the prominent diseases that majorly affect human health and requires the development of different treatment strategies and targeted therapies based on effective disease detection. Therefore, our research aims to identify biomarkers associated with distinct cancer types (gastric, lung, and breast) using machine learning. In the current study, we have analyzed the human genomic data of gastric cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer patients using XGB-BIF (i.e., XGBoost-Driven Biomarker Identification Framework for detecting cancer). The proposed framework utilizes feature selection via XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting), which captures feature interactions efficiently and takes care of the non-linear effects in the genomic data. The research progressed by training XGBoost on the full dataset, ranking the features based on the Gain measure (importance), followed by the classification phase, which employed support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) models for classifying cancer-diseased and non-diseased states. To ensure interpretability and transparency, we also applied SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), enabling the identification of high-impact biomarkers contributing to risk stratification. Biomarker significance is discussed primarily via pathway enrichment and by studying survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression) for identified biomarkers to strengthen translational value. Our models achieved high predictive performance, with an accuracy of more than 90%, to classify and link genomic data into diseased (cancer) and non-diseased states. Furthermore, we evaluated the models using Cohen's Kappa statistic, which confirmed strong agreement between predicted and actual risk categories, with Kappa scores ranging from 0.80 to 0.99. Our proposed framework also achieved strong predictions on the METABRIC dataset during external validation, attaining an AUC-ROC of 93%, accuracy of 0.79%, and Kappa of 74%. Through extensive experimentation, XGB-BIF identified the top biomarker genes for different cancer datasets (gastric, lung, and breast).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.