ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Precision Oncology Framework Using Circulating Tumor Cells.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interactions Between Circulating Tumor Cells and the Immune System in Colorectal Cancer: Friends or Foes?Cancers · 2026Review
- Predictive Value of Circulating Tumor Cells in Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
- Predicting the axillary lymph node tumor burden in breast cancer patients using ultrasonic radiomics nomogram model.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are multifaceted biomarkers with significant potential for precision oncology, offering opportunities to refine diagnoses and personalize treatments across various cancer types, including colorectal and breast cancer. CTC assays serve as reliable prognostic indicators, even during chemotherapy and/or molecularly targeted therapies. Notably, CTCs exhibit heterogeneity that gradually develops during carcinogenesis and becomes more pronounced in advanced disease stages. These intra- and intertumoral heterogeneities pose challenges, particularly when drug-resistant clones emerge following therapy. The dynamic behavior of CTCs provides valuable insights into treatment response and prognosis. Extensive efforts have led to the development of technologies for effective CTC isolation, accelerating their clinical implementation. While both CTC and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) tests offer prognostic value, they reflect different aspects of tumor biology: CTC counts indicate tumor progression, while ctDNA levels correlate with tumor burden. The combined analysis is expected to yield complementary insights. CTC tests are feasible in general hospitals and may serve as tumor markers comparable to, or even superior to, conventional markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) for colorectal cancer, and CA15-3 for breast cancer. Early incorporation of CTC tests into routine blood panels appears to be a rational and promising approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.