ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Role of ChatGPT in Dermatology Diagnostics.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of Facial Assessment in Aesthetic Medicine: 3D Imaging, Digital Analysis, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Evaluating the quality of artificial intelligence responses to psoriasis-related clinical and patient questions: a comparative study of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026Article
- Effect of Fitzpatrick Skin Type Prompting on Diagnostic Accuracy in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Within-Image Experimental Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Human expertise or artificial intelligence? A prospective study on nail disorder diagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- The Power of Multimodality in Multimodal Large Language Models, Unimodal ChatGPT 5.0, and Human Clinical Experts on a Wound Care Certification Examination: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- The Role of AI-Generated Clinical Image Descriptions in Enhancing Teledermatology Diagnosis: A Cross-Sectional Exploratory Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Publicly Available Large Language Models for Trichoscopy: A Head-to-Head Comparison with Dermatologists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- One Step Closer to Conversational Medical Records: ChatGPT Parses Psoriasis Treatments from EMRs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Use of a Large Language Model as a Dermatology Case Narrator: Exploring the Dynamics of a Chatbot as an Educational Tool in Dermatology.JMIR dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), especially large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, has disrupted different medical disciplines, including dermatology. This review explores the application of ChatGPT in dermatological diagnosis, emphasizing its role in natural language processing (NLP) for clinical data interpretation, differential diagnosis assistance, and patient communication enhancement. ChatGPT can enhance a diagnostic workflow when paired with image analysis tools, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), by merging text and image data. While it boasts great capabilities, it still faces some issues, such as its inability to perform any direct image analyses and the risk of inaccurate suggestions. Ethical considerations, including patient data privacy and the responsibilities of the clinician, are discussed. Future perspectives include an integrated multimodal model and AI-assisted framework for diagnosis, which shall improve dermatology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.