ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Time-Frequency Domain Analysis of Quantitative Electroencephalography as a Biomarker for Dementia.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closed-Loop Neuromodulation for Brain Fatigue: From Real-Time Biomarkers to Adaptive Intervention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Quantitative Electroencephalography as a Complement to Symptom-Based Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Application of resting-state EEG theta /alpha power ratio analysis for diagnosing amnestic mild cognitive impairment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Quantitative EEG signatures of power and functional connectivity alterations in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic Mode Decomposition-Based Clustered Pattern Projection for Reliable Alzheimer's Disease Detection from EEG.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal non-invasive approaches for early Alzheimer's disease detection: a review of neuroelectrophysiological and neuroimaging techniques.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Quantitative electroencephalography as a next-generation tool in neurodiagnostics: significance, clinical applications, and practical interpretative frameworks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Explainable machine learning for Alzheimer's disease characterization using small-sample EEG data.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Association of qEEG TAR and TBR During Eyes-Open and Eyes-Closed with Plasma Oligomeric Amyloid-β Levels in an Aging Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Novel Multi-Scale Entropy Approach for EEG-Based Lie Detection with Channel Selection.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomarkers currently used to diagnose dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), primarily detect molecular and structural brain changes associated with the condition's pathology. Although these markers are pivotal in detecting disease-specific neuropathological hallmarks, their association with the clinical manifestations of dementia frequently remains poorly defined and exhibits considerable variability. These biomarkers may show abnormalities in cognitively healthy individuals and frequently fail to accurately represent the severity of cognitive and functional impairments in individuals with dementia. Research indicates that synaptic degeneration and functional impairment occur early in the progression of AD and exhibit the strongest correlation with clinical symptoms. This identifies brain functional impairment measurements as promising early indicators for AD detection. Electroencephalography (EEG), a non-invasive and cost-effective method with high temporal resolution, is used as a biomarker for the early detection and diagnosis of AD through frequency-domain analysis of quantitative EEG (qEEG). Many researchers demonstrate that qEEG measures effectively identify disruptions in neuronal activity, including alterations in activity patterns, topographical distribution, and synchronization. Specific findings along the stages of AD include impaired neuronal synchronization, generalized EEG slowing, and an increase in lower-frequency bands accompanied by a decrease in higher-frequency bands of resting state EEG. Moreover, qEEG helps clinicians effectively correlate indicators of AD neuropathology and distinguish between various forms of dementia, positioning it as a promising, low-cost, non-invasive biomarker for dementia. However, additional clinical investigation is required to clarify the diagnostic and prognostic significance of qEEG measurements as early functional markers for AD. This narrative review examines time-frequency domain qEEG analysis as a potential biomarker across various types of dementia. Through a structured search of PubMed and Scopus, we identified studies assessing spectral and connectivity-based qEEG features. Consistent findings include EEG slowing, reduced functional connectivity, and network desynchronization. The review outlines key methodological challenges, such as lack of standardization and limited longitudinal validation, and recommends integrative, multimodal approaches to enhance diagnostic precision and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.