ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development of a Clinical Risk Assessment Score for Respiratory Distress Due to Respiratory Infections in Early Infancy.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesNeonatal and infant respiratory distress carries high morbidity, and severity can vary with gestational maturity and perinatal factors. Early risk stratification may improve outcomes, but existing assessment tools do not fully address age-related risk differences. We aimed to develop and validate a Neonatal Clinical Risk Assessment Score (N-CRAS) for predicting severity in neonates and young infants with respiratory distress due to respiratory infection.
methodsThis pilot score was applied exclusively to a cohort of forty neonates and young infants with respiratory distress secondary to infectious causes, as defined by clinical and laboratory parameters. Clinical variables (gestational age, delivery mode, birth weight category, and APGAR score) were recorded and analyzed for associations with illness severity. We developed the N-CRAS (0-5 points) encompassing five indicators of severe illness (respiratory infection, metabolic disorder, need for symptomatic treatment, mechanical ventilation, and intubation), each contributing 1 point. Patients were stratified as low (0-1), moderate (2-3), or high (4-5) risk. Chi-square tests and Spearman correlation assessed associations, and an ROC curve evaluated the score's predictive performance for intubation.
resultsNo individual perinatal factor was significantly associated with respiratory illness severity. The N-CRAS increased with infant age (
conclusionsIn this pilot study, the N-CRAS demonstrated a strong correlation with clinical severity and successfully identified all infants who required intubation. However, given the small cohort size and limited number of severe cases, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Further external validation in larger and more diverse neonatal populations is essential to confirm its predictive utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.