ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Generative Artificial Intelligence Literacy: Scale Development and Its Effect on Job Performance.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating generative AI into physiotherapy education: students' use, perceptions, and generative AI literacy following curricular adaptations: a repeated cross-sectional programme evaluation.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Generative artificial intelligence literacy profiles and workforce readiness among pre-professional nursing students: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Cognitive capability and behavioral exposure in generative AI use: a dual-pathway model of perceived facilitation and integrity-related risk.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Information bubble and skill evolution: a theoretical framework for integrating distributed cognition, cognition offloading, and metacognitive regulation based on AIOE.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Article
- AI literacy and creative self-beliefs among Chinese college students: examining the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence, its application in the workplace has shown significant innovative potential and practical value. However, the existing literature lacks a systematic and widely applicable definition and measurement framework for Generative AI Literacy. Based on the existing literature and following a rigorous scale development process, this study constructs a Generative AI Literacy measurement framework that covers five core dimensions, basic technical competence, prompt optimization, content evaluation, innovative application, and ethical and compliance awareness, and validates its reliability and validity. Furthermore, based on the Ability-Motivation-Opportunity (AMO) theory, this study explores the mechanism through which Generative AI Literacy influences employee job performance and examines the mediating role of Creative Self-Efficacy. The results show that Generative AI Literacy has a significant positive impact on job performance (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.