Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40564527›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Phubbing Behaviour: A Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Production.

Ana Cebollero-Salinas, Begoña Gutiérrez-Nieto, Jacobo Cano-Escoriaza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana Cebollero-SalinasDepartment of Educational Science, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2515-9029
Begoña Gutiérrez-NietoDepartment of Accounting and Finance, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3044-4983
Jacobo Cano-EscoriazaDepartment of Sciences Education, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8422-9213

Funding

Government of Aragon and University of Zaragoza Project: Mental Health and Responsible Digital Consumption, Evolutionary study and design of strategies for prevention from an early age 2022/0625Government of Aragon: Educaviva S38-23R, S57-23RSpanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) A way of making Europe PID2019-107822RB-I00, PID2022-136818NB-I00 and PID2023-146084OB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phubbing refers to the act of ignoring someone in a face-to-face conversation by paying more attention to a mobile phone. This practice, although common, has been identified as harmful and deserves to be considered a problem. As a result, it has captured the attention of the scientific community, with a significant increase in studies in recent years. However, there is a lack of bibliometric analyses examining existing research on this topic, which would be useful in guiding future studies. This article seeks to fill that gap by providing a detailed bibliometric analysis of phubbing. It analyses the entire production in the Web of Science database between 1985 and 2022 (199 articles and 82 keywords). The study employs citation, co-occurrence, and co-citation analysis techniques using scientific maps created with VOSviewer software. The results indicate that most research has focused on how phubbing affects romantic relationships, with less emphasis on other types of relationships such as family, work, or friends. Areas that require further research are identified, such as motivations for internet use, the tendency to compare oneself on social networks, impulsivity, and the influence of executive functions on phubbing. Further exploration of the relationship between phubbing and other disorders is also suggested. This analysis will serve as a guide and stimulus for future research, offering valuable resources for professionals in psychology, health, and education.

Indexed as

bibliometricsliterature reviewphubbingscientometricstechnoference

Identifiers

PMID40564527
PMCPMC12189382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.