ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Rapid and Unpredictable Shifts in Perceived Pleasantness of Continuous Affective Touch.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Affective touch (stroking the skin at velocities between 1 and 10 cm/s) is generally perceived as pleasant. However, this pleasant sensation diminishes with continuous stimulation over several minutes, with substantial individual variability in the habituation process. This study aimed to identify individual characteristics associated with the decline in the hedonic value of prolonged affective touch. Eighty-one female participants (mean age = 26 years) received continuous stroking on their forearms for 10 min at two distinct velocities: 3 cm/s (affective touch) and 30 cm/s (nonaffective touch). Every 100 s, participants rated the perceived pleasantness of the stimulation. Regression analyses were conducted to examine whether participants' age, attitude toward touch by an unfamiliar person, recalled positive touch experiences during childhood, sympathy toward the toucher, reported symptoms of anxiety, depression, or somatization, and order of touch conditions predicted changes in their responses. On average, the perceived pleasantness of touch declined over time. The extent of the decline and individual variability in pleasantness ratings were not significantly associated with the selected predictors. However, higher overall ratings of affective touch pleasantness were linked to greater sympathy toward the toucher, lower levels of depression and somatization, and a lower frequency of recalled positive touch experiences during childhood. Affective touch was perceived as more pleasant when it was preceded by the nonaffective touch condition, compared to when the order was reversed. Order effects, the rapid decline, and substantial individual variability in the perceived pleasantness of prolonged affective touch should be considered in both research and therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.