ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Dynamically Quantifying Vocal Fold Thickness: Effects of Medialization Implant Location on Glottal Shape and Phonation.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of infraglottal implantation on voice production in type I thyroplasty: a computational study.Journal of biomechanics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) can lead to significant dysphonia. Medialization thyroplasty type 1 (TT1) is a common surgical intervention aiming at improving vocal quality by optimally positioning the paralyzed fold to generate the necessary vibrations for phonation. Implants are generally placed through the thyroid cartilage in a sedated patient and positioned either underneath the level of the vocal folds (infraglottal medialization or IM) or at the level of the vocal folds (glottal medialization or GM). Using high-speed three-dimensional digital image correlation (3D-DIC) in an ex vivo canine hemilarynx model, this study explores the impact of implant location, specifically IM versus GM on the pre-phonatory and dynamic vertical thickness, glottal divergence, flow rate (Q), and cepstral peak prominence (CPP) under varying adduction and subglottal pressure conditions. IM consistently increased glottal divergence and dynamic vertical thickness, particularly in under-adducted states (AL1), despite producing lower static thickness than GM. CPP remained unaffected by the implant condition, but Q decreased significantly with IM under AL1, indicating enhanced glottal resistance and closure. These findings suggest that IM may offer superior functional outcomes by restoring divergent glottal shaping and improving vibratory efficiency. This study also introduces a validated method for dynamically quantifying vocal fold thickness and emphasizes the importance of implant depth in medialization thyroplasty strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.