ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Cell-Based Therapies: Ferromagnetic Versus Superparamagnetic Cell Targeting.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stem-cell-based therapies rely on the transplantation of stem cells or stem-cell-derived organotypic cells into injured tissues in order to improve or restore tissue function that has been impaired by various diseases. The potential of induced pluripotent stem cells has created many applications in the field of cell therapy, for example. Some applications, for example, those in cardiac cell therapy, suffer from low or very low efficiencies of cell engraftment. Therefore, magnetic cell targeting can be discussed as a method for capturing superparamagnetic nanoparticle-labelled cells in the tissue. Here, we employ superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) for the intracellular magnetic loading of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). In addition, we test a novel strategy of labelling MSCs with ferromagnetic particles. The adhesion assays demonstrate a faster adhesion kinetic of SPIONs-loaded MSC spheroids when a magnetic field was applied, resulting in >50% spheroid adhesion after 30 min. Clustering of cells inside the magnetic field is a second potential mechanism of magnetic cell retention and >80% of cells were found to be aggregated in clusters when placed in a magnetic field for 10 min. SPIONs-loaded and ferromagnetic-particle-loaded cells performed equally in the cell clustering assay. In conclusion, the clustering of SPION-labelled cells explains the observation that magnetic targeting reaches maximal efficiency in vivo after only 10 min of magnetic field application. This has significant implications for magnetic-targeting-assisted stem cell and cell replacement therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.