ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploration of Cytokines That Impact the Therapeutic Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Alzheimer's Disease.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Extracellular Vesicles in Neurological Disorders: Mechanisms, Delivery Strategies, and a Translational Roadmap.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Extracellular Vesicles for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Therapeutic Advances and Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) includes acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, NMDA receptor antagonists, and amyloid beta (Aβ)/Tau-targeting drugs. While these drugs improve cognitive decline and target the pathological mechanisms, their outcomes still are still in debate. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) offer a regenerative approach by modulating neuroinflammation and promoting neuroprotection. Although the paracrine of MSCs is efficient in various AD preclinical studies and the exosomes of MSCs have entered clinical trials, the key cytokines driving the efficacy remain unclear. Here, we evaluated human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (hUC-MSCs) and employed gene-silenced MSCs (siHGF-MSCs, siTNFR1-MSCs, siBDNF-MSCs) in APP/PS1 AD mice to investigate specific mechanisms. hUC-MSCs significantly reduced Aβ/Tau pathology and neuroinflammation, with cytokine-specific contributions: silencing HGF predominantly reduced Aβ/Tau clearance, although silencing TNFR1 or BDNF showed modest effects; silencing TNFR1 or BDNF more prominently weakened anti-neuroinflammation, while silencing HGF exerted a weaker influence. All three cytokines partially contributed to oxidative stress reduction and cognitive improvements. Our study highlights MSC-driven AD alleviation as a multifactorial strategy and reveals specific cytokines alleviating different aspects of AD pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.