ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Dual-Feature Framework for Enhanced Diagnosis of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Subtypes Using Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myeloproliferative neoplasms, particularly the Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-negative) subtypes such as essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and primary myelofibrosis, present diagnostic challenges due to overlapping morphological features and clinical heterogeneity. Traditional diagnostic approaches, including imaging and histopathological analysis, are often limited by interobserver variability, delayed diagnosis, and subjective interpretations. To address these limitations, we propose a novel framework that integrates handcrafted and automatic feature extraction techniques for improved classification of Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. Handcrafted features capture interpretable morphological and textural characteristics. In contrast, automatic features utilize deep learning models to identify complex patterns in histopathological images. The extracted features were used to train machine learning models, with hyperparameter optimization performed using Optuna. Our framework achieved high performance across multiple metrics, including precision, recall, F1 score, accuracy, specificity, and weighted average. The concatenated probabilities, which combine both feature types, demonstrated the highest mean weighted average of 0.9969, surpassing the individual performances of handcrafted (0.9765) and embedded features (0.9686). Statistical analysis confirmed the robustness and reliability of the results. However, challenges remain in assuming normal distributions for certain feature types. This study highlights the potential of combining domain-specific knowledge with data-driven approaches to enhance diagnostic accuracy and support clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.