Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40564431›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Accelerometry and the Capacity-Performance Gap: Case Series Report in Upper-Extremity Motor Impairment Assessment Post-Stroke.

Estevan M Nieto, Edaena Lujan, Crystal A Mendoza, Yazbel Arriaga, Cecilia Fierro, Tan Tran, Lin-Ching Chang, Alvaro N Gurovich, Peter S Lum, Shashwati Geed

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07661849 (Efficacy of Tele-CPASS, a Telerehabilitation Intervention Using Critical Periods After Stroke Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07661849 narecruitingnot on this map

Efficacy of Tele-CPASS, a Telerehabilitation Intervention Using Critical Periods After Stroke Study (CPASS) Compared to In-person CPASS for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas, El PasoRan2025 to 2029Enrolled42ConditionsStroke, Hemiparesis, Upper Extremity Impairments, Stroke RehabilitationArmsTele-CPASS, In-person CPASS therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Estevan M NietoDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
Edaena LujanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
Crystal A MendozaDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
Yazbel ArriagaDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
Cecilia FierroDepartment of Occupational Therapy, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79902, USA.
Tan TranDepartment of Computer Science, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA.
Lin-Ching ChangDepartment of Computer Science, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA.
Alvaro N GurovichDepartment of Physical Therapy and Movement Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8823-3391
Peter S LumDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4735-6114
Shashwati GeedDepartment of Physical Therapy and Movement Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0190-6923

Funding

National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research 90REGE0004-01-00Sobel Duncan Border Health Research Award NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case series investigates whether traditional machine learning (ML) and convolutional neural network (CNN) models trained on wrist-worn accelerometry data collected in a laboratory setting can accurately predict real-world functional hand use in individuals with chronic stroke. Participants (N = 4) with neuroimaging-confirmed chronic stroke completed matched activity scripts-comprising instrumental and basic activities of daily living-in-lab and at-home. Participants wore ActiGraph CenterPoint Insight watches on the impaired and unimpaired wrists; concurrent video recordings were collected in both environments. Frame-by-frame annotations of the video, guided by the FAABOS scale (functional, non-functional, unknown), served as the ground truth. The results revealed a consistent capacity-performance gap: participants used their impaired hand more in-lab than at-home, with the largest discrepancies in patients with moderate to severe impairment. Random forest ML models trained on in-lab accelerometry accurately classified at-home hand use, with the highest performance in mildly and severely impaired limbs (accuracy = 0.80-0.90) and relatively lower performance (accuracy = 0.62) in moderately impaired limbs. CNN models showed comparable accuracy to random forest classifiers. These pilot findings demonstrate the feasibility of using lab-trained ML models to monitor real-world hand use and identify emerging patterns of learned non-use-enabling timely, targeted interventions to promote recovery in outpatient stroke rehabilitation.

Indexed as

accelerometrymotor outcomesmotor recoveryneurorehabilitationstrokestroke rehabilitation trials

Identifiers

PMID40564431
PMCPMC12189469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.