Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40564429›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Capsule Endoscopy: Current Trends, Technological Advancements, and Future Perspectives in Gastrointestinal Diagnostics.

Chang-Chao Su, Chu-Kuang Chou, Arvind Mukundan, Riya Karmakar, Binusha Fathima Sanbatcha, Chien-Wei Huang, Wei-Chun Weng, Hsiang-Chen Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chang-Chao SuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi 60002, Taiwan.
Chu-Kuang ChouDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi 60002, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2588-6883
Arvind MukundanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, 168, University Rd., Min Hsiung, Chia-Yi 62102, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7741-3722
Riya KarmakarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, 168, University Rd., Min Hsiung, Chia-Yi 62102, Taiwan.
Binusha Fathima SanbatchaDepartment of Biotechnology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Salem-Kochi Hwy, Coimbatore 641021, India.
Chien-Wei HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, 2, Zhongzheng 1st.Rd., Lingya District, Kaohsiung City 80284, Taiwan.
Wei-Chun WengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, 2, Zhongzheng 1st.Rd., Lingya District, Kaohsiung City 80284, Taiwan.
Hsiang-Chen WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, 168, University Rd., Min Hsiung, Chia-Yi 62102, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4107-2062

Funding

National Science and Technology Council NSTC 113-2221-E-194-011-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capsule endoscopy (CE) has revolutionized gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostics by providing a non-invasive, patient-centered approach to observing the digestive tract. Conceived in 2000 by Gavriel Iddan, CE employs a diminutive, ingestible capsule containing a high-resolution camera, LED lighting, and a power supply. It specializes in visualizing the small intestine, a region frequently unreachable by conventional endoscopy. CE helps detect and monitor disorders, such as unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding, Crohn's disease, and cancer, while presenting a lower procedural risk than conventional endoscopy. Contrary to conventional techniques that necessitate anesthesia, CE reduces patient discomfort and complications. Nonetheless, its constraints, specifically the incapacity to conduct biopsies or therapeutic procedures, have spurred technical advancements. Five primary types of capsule endoscopes have emerged: steerable, magnetic, robotic, tethered, and hybrid. Their performance varies substantially. For example, the image sizes vary from 256 × 256 to 640 × 480 pixels, the fields of view (FOV) range from 140° to 360°, the battery life is between 8 and 15 h, and the frame rates fluctuate from 2 to 35 frames per second, contingent upon motion-adaptive capture. This study addresses a significant gap by methodically evaluating CE platforms, outlining their clinical preparedness, and examining the underexploited potential of artificial intelligence in improving diagnostic precision. Through the examination of technical requirements and clinical integration, we highlight the progress made in overcoming existing CE constraints and outline prospective developments for next-generation GI diagnostics.

Indexed as

capsule endoscopehybrid capsule endoscopymachine learningmagnetic capsule endoscopynarrow-band imagingPillCamrobotic capsule endoscopysteerable capsule endoscopewhite-light imaging

Identifiers

PMID40564429
PMCPMC12189750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.