ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Experiences of People with Multiple Sclerosis in Sensor-Based Jump Assessment.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: Technological Advances for Gait and Balance Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Immersive Virtual Reality Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis: Patient-Reported Experience and Correlates.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- User-centered design and formative evaluation of a gait dashboard for multidimensional walking assessment in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- From implementation to discontinuation: multi-year experience with the multiple sclerosis performance test as a digital monitoring tool.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Jump assessment on a force plate-an approach to quantify subtle lower limb neuromuscular deficits in people with multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: When implementing new biomechanical and technology-based assessments, such as the jump assessment in Multiple Sclerosis (MS), into clinical routine, it is important to ensure that they are based on the real needs of patients and to identify and adapt to potential barriers early on. (2) Methods: In the present cross-sectional study, 157 pwMS performed a sensor-based jump assessment on a force plate consisting of three jump tests: 10 s jump test (10SHT), countermovement jumps (CMJ), and single-leg countermovement jumps (SLCMJ). After the jump assessment, the patient experience measures (PREM) were recorded using a paper-based questionnaire on an 11-point scale from 0 (positive) to 10 (negative). (3) Results: PwMS showed an overall positive experience with the sensor-based jump assessment. "Staff support performance", "acceptance required time", "usefulness" of the results, and "integration of results in therapy" were the best rated items with a median of 0 (positive). The CMJ was perceived as the easy (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.