ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Research on Medical Image Segmentation Based on SAM and Its Future Prospects.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic data enables human-grade microtubule analysis with foundation models for segmentation.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Applications, image analysis, and interpretation of computer vision in medical imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid advancement of prompt-based models in natural language processing and image generation has revolutionized the field of image segmentation. The introduction of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) has further invigorated this domain with its unprecedented versatility. However, its applicability to medical image segmentation remains uncertain due to significant disparities between natural and medical images, which demand careful consideration. This study comprehensively analyzes recent efforts to adapt SAM for medical image segmentation, including empirical benchmarking and methodological refinements aimed at bridging the gap between SAM's capabilities and the unique challenges of medical imaging. Furthermore, we explore future directions for SAM in this field. While direct application of SAM to complex, multimodal, and multi-target medical datasets may not yet yield optimal results, insights from these efforts provide crucial guidance for developing foundational models tailored to the intricacies of medical image analysis. Despite existing challenges, SAM holds considerable potential to demonstrate its unique advantages and robust capabilities in medical image segmentation in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.