ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
e-Health Strategy for Surgical Prioritization: A Methodology Based on Digital Twins and Reinforcement Learning.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural requirements for intelligent clinical digital twins in feedback-driven care.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Development and clinical application of an Intelligent Operating Room Scheduling System.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article presents a methodological framework for elective surgery scheduling based on the integration of patient-specific Digital Twins (DTs) and reinforcement learning (RL). The proposed approach aims to support the future development of an intelligent e-health platform for dynamic, data-driven prioritization of surgical patients. We generate prioritization scores by modeling clinical, economic, behavioral, and social variables in real time and optimize access through a reinforcement learning engine designed to maximize long-term system performance. The methodology is designed as a modular, transparent, and interoperable digital decision-support architecture aligned with the goals of organizational transformation and equitable healthcare delivery. To validate its potential, we simulate realistic surgical scheduling scenarios using synthetic patient data. Results demonstrate substantial improvements compared withto traditional strategies, including a 55.1% reduction in average wait time, a 41.9% decrease in clinical risk at surgery, a 16.1% increase in OR utilization, and a significant increase in the prioritization of socially vulnerable patients. These findings highlight the value of the proposed framework as a foundation for future smart healthcare platforms that support transparent, adaptive, and ethically aligned decision-making in surgical scheduling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.