ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Variable Selection for Multivariate Failure Time Data via Regularized Sparse-Input Neural Network.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative evaluation of deep learning models for the classification of encoded splice-junction sequences.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study addresses the problem of simultaneous variable selection and model estimation in multivariate failure time data, a common challenge in clinical trials with multiple correlated time-to-event endpoints. We propose a unified framework that identifies predictors shared across outcomes, applicable to both low- and high-dimensional settings. For linear marginal hazard models, we develop a penalized pseudo-partial likelihood approach with a group LASSO-type penalty applied to the ℓ2 norms of coefficients corresponding to the same covariates across marginal hazard functions. To capture potential nonlinear effects, we further extend the approach to a sparse-input neural network model with structured group penalties on input-layer weights. Both methods are optimized using a composite gradient descent algorithm combining standard gradient steps with proximal updates. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed methods yield superior variable selection and predictive performance compared to traditional and outcome-specific approaches, while remaining robust to violations of the common predictor assumption. In an application to advanced prostate cancer data, the framework identifies both established clinical factors and potentially novel prognostic single-nucleotide polymorphisms for overall and progression-free survival. This work provides a flexible and robust tool for analyzing complex multivariate survival data, with potential utility in prognostic modeling and personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.