ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Scoping Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Marker-Based Clinical Gait Analysis.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subject-Level Classification of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head from Wearable IMU Gait Data Using Multilevel Feature Fusion.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- OpenSim-Umberger-Based Metabolic Power Stratification During the Sit-to-Walk Transition Using Interpretable Ensemble Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An improved ICEEMDAN-depth hybrid network model integrating multimodal data for the screening of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning in Adapted Physical Activity: Clinical Applications, Monitoring, and Implementation Pathways for Personalized Exercise in Chronic Conditions: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Interpretable side-aware kinematic-sEMG gait-state representations relevant to adaptive neurorobotic assistance after stroke: a public-dataset study.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2026Article
- Biomechanics of Human Motion and Its Clinical Applications: Instrumented Gait Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- PredictMed-CDSS: Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support System Predicting the Probability to Develop Neuromuscular Hip Dysplasia.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Application of multidimensional gait feature fusion algorithm in gait assessment for patients with knee osteoarthritis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recent proliferation of novel machine learning techniques in quantitative marker-based 3D gait analysis (3DGA) has shown promise for improving interpretations of clinical gait analysis. The objective of this study was to characterize the state of the literature on using machine learning in the analysis of marker-based 3D gait analysis to provide clinical insights that may be used to improve clinical analysis and care.
methodsA scoping review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Search terms from eight relevant articles were identified by the authors and added to by experts in clinical gait analysis and machine learning. Inclusion was decided by the adjudication of three reviewers.
resultsThe review identified 4324 articles matching the search terms. Adjudication identified 105 relevant papers. The most commonly applied techniques were the following: support vector machines, neural networks (NNs), and logistic regression. The most common clinical conditions evaluated were cerebral palsy, Parkinson's disease, and post-stroke.
conclusionsML has been used broadly in the literature and recent advances in deep learning have been more successful in larger datasets while traditional techniques are robust in small datasets and can outperform NNs in accuracy and explainability. XAI techniques can improve model interpretability but have not been broadly used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.