Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40564408›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Scoping Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Marker-Based Clinical Gait Analysis.

Kevin N Dibbern, Maddalena G Krzak, Alejandro Olivas, Mark V Albert, Joseph J Krzak, Karen M Kruger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin N DibbernDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Maddalena G KrzakDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53223, USA.
Alejandro OlivasMotion Analysis Center, Shriners Children's, Chicago, IL 60707, USA.
Mark V AlbertDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3977-2895
Joseph J KrzakMotion Analysis Center, Shriners Children's, Chicago, IL 60707, USA.
Karen M KrugerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53223, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3633-315X

Funding

National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research 09ARHF0006-01-00Shriners Hospitals for Children Clinical Research Grant #79148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent proliferation of novel machine learning techniques in quantitative marker-based 3D gait analysis (3DGA) has shown promise for improving interpretations of clinical gait analysis. The objective of this study was to characterize the state of the literature on using machine learning in the analysis of marker-based 3D gait analysis to provide clinical insights that may be used to improve clinical analysis and care.

methodsA scoping review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Search terms from eight relevant articles were identified by the authors and added to by experts in clinical gait analysis and machine learning. Inclusion was decided by the adjudication of three reviewers.

resultsThe review identified 4324 articles matching the search terms. Adjudication identified 105 relevant papers. The most commonly applied techniques were the following: support vector machines, neural networks (NNs), and logistic regression. The most common clinical conditions evaluated were cerebral palsy, Parkinson's disease, and post-stroke.

conclusionsML has been used broadly in the literature and recent advances in deep learning have been more successful in larger datasets while traditional techniques are robust in small datasets and can outperform NNs in accuracy and explainability. XAI techniques can improve model interpretability but have not been broadly used.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical gait analysisexplainable AImachine learningmarker-based gait analysisoptical motion capturequantitative gait analysisscoping reviewXAI

Identifiers

PMID40564408
PMCPMC12189510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.