ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Eliminating the Need for Anesthesia in Sleep Endoscopy: A Comparative Study of Traditional Nasopharyngoscope Design Versus NasoLens.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Controversial Aspects in Sedative Techniques for Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE)-A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the potential of a novel sleep endoscope, NasoLens, to eliminate the need for anesthesia in sleep endoscopy. We assess NasoLens' safety, maneuverability, and ability to allow sleep without sedatives, aiming to improve the overall patient experience and reduce risks associated with anesthesia. Sleep endoscopy is commonly performed under anesthesia, which introduces risks, increases costs, and can limit accessibility. NasoLens' design aims to address these challenges by improving patient comfort and enhancing maneuverability, eliminating the need for anesthesia. This could provide a safer, more cost-effective alternative for patients, particularly those at higher risk for anesthesia-related complications. NasoLens distinguishes itself with its smaller size, teardrop-shaped head, specialized camera angle for better visualization, and an integrated microphone for real-time auditory monitoring. These features enable NasoLens to offer improved maneuverability and comfort, compared to traditional nasopharyngoscopes, while enhancing diagnostic accuracy. These design innovations could revolutionize clinical practice by minimizing anesthesia-related risks, reducing procedural costs, and improving both procedural efficiency and patient satisfaction. With its ability to allow natural sleep without sedation, NasoLens has the potential to improve patient satisfaction, procedural outcomes, and expand the feasibility of sleep endoscopy into more accessible clinical settings, making it a promising alternative to traditional models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.