Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40564381›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Safety of Simultaneous Scalp and Intracranial EEG and fMRI: Evaluation of RF-Induced Heating.

Hassan B Hawsawi, Anastasia Papadaki, Vejay N Vakharia, John S Thornton, David W Carmichael, Suchit Kumar, Louis Lemieux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hassan B HawsawiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-7327
Anastasia PapadakiLysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Vejay N VakhariaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
John S ThorntonLysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
David W CarmichaelDevelopmental Imaging and Biophysics Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9972-0718
Suchit KumarDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0885-2860
Louis LemieuxDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3036-7412

Funding

UCL-held UKRI funding and Wellcome Trust funding and the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre 0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acquisition of electroencephalography (EEG) concurrently with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) requires a careful consideration of the health hazards resulting from interactions between the scanner's electromagnetic fields and EEG recording equipment. The primary safety concern is excessive RF-induced heating of the tissue in the vicinity of electrodes. We have previously demonstrated that concurrent intracranial EEG (icEEG) and fMRI data acquisitions (icEEG-fMRI) can be performed with acceptable risk in specific conditions using a head RF transmit coil. Here, we estimate the potential additional heating associated with the addition of scalp EEG electrodes using a body transmit RF coil. In this study, electrodes were placed in clinically realistic positions on a phantom in two configurations: (1) icEEG electrodes only, and (2) following the addition of subdermal scalp electrodes. Heating was measured during MRI scans using a body transmit coil with a high specific absorption rate (SAR), TSE (turbo spin echo), and low SAR gradient-echo EPI (echo-planar imaging) sequences. During the application of the high-SAR sequence, the maximum temperature change for the intracranial electrodes was +2.8 °C. The addition of the subdural scalp EEG electrodes resulted in a maximum temperature change for the intracranial electrodes of 2.1 °C and +0.6 °C across the scalp electrodes. For the low-SAR sequence, the maximum temperature increase across all intracranial and scalp electrodes was +0.7 °C; in this condition, the temperature increases around the intracranial electrodes were below the detection level. Therefore, in the experimental conditions (MRI scanner, electrode, and wire configurations) used at our centre for icEEG-fMRI, adding six scalp EEG electrodes did not result in significant additional localised RF-induced heating compared to the model using icEEG electrodes only.

Indexed as

EEGEEG fMRIelectroencephalographyfunctional MRIicEEGintracranialintracranial EEGmagnetic resonance imagingradio frequencyRF heatingsafetyscalpscalp EEGtemperature measurements

Identifiers

PMID40564381
PMCPMC12189528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.