ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Safety of Simultaneous Scalp and Intracranial EEG and fMRI: Evaluation of RF-Induced Heating.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The acquisition of electroencephalography (EEG) concurrently with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) requires a careful consideration of the health hazards resulting from interactions between the scanner's electromagnetic fields and EEG recording equipment. The primary safety concern is excessive RF-induced heating of the tissue in the vicinity of electrodes. We have previously demonstrated that concurrent intracranial EEG (icEEG) and fMRI data acquisitions (icEEG-fMRI) can be performed with acceptable risk in specific conditions using a head RF transmit coil. Here, we estimate the potential additional heating associated with the addition of scalp EEG electrodes using a body transmit RF coil. In this study, electrodes were placed in clinically realistic positions on a phantom in two configurations: (1) icEEG electrodes only, and (2) following the addition of subdermal scalp electrodes. Heating was measured during MRI scans using a body transmit coil with a high specific absorption rate (SAR), TSE (turbo spin echo), and low SAR gradient-echo EPI (echo-planar imaging) sequences. During the application of the high-SAR sequence, the maximum temperature change for the intracranial electrodes was +2.8 °C. The addition of the subdural scalp EEG electrodes resulted in a maximum temperature change for the intracranial electrodes of 2.1 °C and +0.6 °C across the scalp electrodes. For the low-SAR sequence, the maximum temperature increase across all intracranial and scalp electrodes was +0.7 °C; in this condition, the temperature increases around the intracranial electrodes were below the detection level. Therefore, in the experimental conditions (MRI scanner, electrode, and wire configurations) used at our centre for icEEG-fMRI, adding six scalp EEG electrodes did not result in significant additional localised RF-induced heating compared to the model using icEEG electrodes only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.