ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Canonical Discriminant Mapping of Origins in Andalusian Black Cattle: Inbreeding and Coancestry Decomposition via Mendelian Sampling Variances and Nodal Ancestor Contributions.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Andalusian Black Cattle (Negra Andaluza) represents a genetic lineage linked to the ancient Eurasian aurochs, shaped by domestication events in the Near East and later introgressions from Italian and North African wild cattle. This study investigates the breed's anthropological and historical origins, geographical distribution, and genetic structure. Key influences include historical use as draft animals, regional breeding preferences, and gene flow via transhumant routes. The genetic analysis reveals that Córdoba is the principal nucleus, accounting for 448 identified ancestors, compared to 252 in Huelva and 193 in Seville. In Córdoba, contributions of nodal ancestors through inbreeding loops reached a maximum of 0.0447, while mean inbreeding (F¯) was 0.000949 and mean coancestry (C¯) was 0.000475, indicating moderate but geographically structured genetic drift. In contrast, areas with better connectivity showed higher heterogeneity and lower inbreeding contributions. Canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) revealed that the first discriminant function (F1) explained 79.72% of the variation among groups, primarily driven by nodal ancestors and inbreeding loops. Despite these signs of inbreeding, historical transhumance has helped preserve overall genetic diversity. These findings offer essential insights for conservation programs aimed at maintaining both the genetic integrity and adaptive potential of this historically and culturally important breed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.