Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40564316›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Livestock Farm Recovery Following Bushfire in South-Eastern Australia: Impacts on Cattle and Sheep Health and Management.

Megan Thomas, John Webb Ware, Brendan Cowled, Carolina Munoz, Elicia Cheah, Peter Mansell, Henry Clutterbuck, Mark Doyle, Alison Hillman, Caitlin Pfeiffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Megan ThomasMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6851-875X
John Webb WareMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Brendan CowledAusvet, Fremantle 6160, Australia.
Carolina MunozMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Elicia CheahMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.
Peter MansellMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7216-2947
Henry ClutterbuckSouth East Local Land Services, Goulburn 2580, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0782-7372
Mark DoyleSouth East Local Land Services, Goulburn 2580, Australia.
Alison HillmanAusvet, Fremantle 6160, Australia.
Caitlin PfeifferMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.

Funding

Meat & Livestock Australia B.AHE.2102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe bushfires in South-Eastern Australia during the summer of 2019/2020 killed tens of thousands of livestock, while many more survived on fire-affected properties. At the time, the literature on bushfire and livestock in Australia primarily described animals with burns. The mid- to long-term health effects, if any, of fire exposure and the effectiveness of recovery activities for surviving animals and farm enterprises were rarely reported. This study aimed to describe the key impacts of bushfire exposure on the health, welfare, and management of surviving cattle and sheep to inform recommendations for future fire-affected farmers and to guide future research. As part of a broad research programme, data on bushfire experiences, consequences for the livestock and the farm enterprise, and lessons learnt were gathered through face-to-face interviews and an online survey, collating information from 58 fire-affected farmers. A variety of health conditions at low frequency were reported in livestock surviving bushfires, including respiratory disease, eye disease, ruminal acidosis, lameness, and plant toxicities. No single disease was observed widely across participating farms, with many conditions likely associated with management changes post-fire rather than direct fire exposure. A variety of management and farm biosecurity challenges were also described by farmers. Key strategies for the prevention and treatment of health conditions in livestock post-bushfire include supporting effective farm management through the challenges of post-fire recovery and early detection for treatment on a case-by-case basis.

Indexed as

animal healthAustraliabiosecurityburnsbushfirecattlefarm managementlivestocksheep

Identifiers

PMID40564316
PMCPMC12189280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.