Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40564298›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Worth the Effort? Rehabilitation Causes and Outcomes and the Assessment of Post-Release Survival for Urban Wild Bird Admissions in a European Metropolis.

Marc Engler, Rebekka Sens, Maja Lundberg, Alexandra Delor, Marco Stelter, Malte Tschertner, Sina Feyer, Stephanie Zein, Lesley Halter-Gölkel, Rainer Altenkamp and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marc EnglerNABU Landesverband Berlin e.V., Wollankstraße 4, 13187 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3461-0953
Rebekka SensNABU Landesverband Berlin e.V., Wollankstraße 4, 13187 Berlin, Germany.
Maja LundbergNABU Landesverband Berlin e.V., Wollankstraße 4, 13187 Berlin, Germany.
Alexandra DelorNABU Landesverband Berlin e.V., Wollankstraße 4, 13187 Berlin, Germany.
Marco StelterNABU Landesverband Berlin e.V., Wollankstraße 4, 13187 Berlin, Germany.
Malte TschertnerIndependent Researcher, 10997 Berlin, Germany.
Sina FeyerSmall Animal Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5498-0679
Stephanie ZeinSmall Animal Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2237-5976
Lesley Halter-GölkelSmall Animal Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-1617-2391
Rainer AltenkampNABU Landesverband Berlin e.V., Wollankstraße 4, 13187 Berlin, Germany.
Kerstin MüllerSmall Animal Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0618-6961

Funding

Senate Department for Justice and Consumer Protection of BerlinSenate Department for Urban Mobility, Transport, Climate Action and the Environment of Berlin
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, millions of wild birds are admitted to rehabilitation centres each year. We analysed data on wild bird admissions at an urban rehabilitation centre in Berlin, Germany, collected over 20 years (2005-2024), aiming to (a) characterise admission causes and demographics, (b) investigate the rehabilitation duration and release probability across admission causes and systematic bird groups, and (c) assess post-release survival as a proxy for rehabilitation success. Longer rehabilitation durations were generally associated with orphaned birds and those in poor condition or who had had an infection. Orphans and birds with undetermined admission causes were most likely to be released. Birds that were admitted in poor condition were least likely to be released, which was particularly the case among Passerines. The monitoring of post-release survival through ring recovery data revealed higher recovery rates for larger birds but no informative value on post-release survival across species; thus, it did not represent an ideal measure of rehabilitation success in terms of the original objective. We conclude that the extent, outcome, and success of wild bird rehabilitation may depend on the initial cause of admission and may differ between bird groups. Advanced measures to assess post-release survival should be considered to allocate the limited resources and the conservation efforts of wild bird rehabilitation centres to birds of species and/or admission causes best suited to undergoing rehabilitation.

Indexed as

admission causeconservationpost-release survivalrehabilitationwild birdswildlife rescue centre

Identifiers

PMID40564298
PMCPMC12189551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.