ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Worth the Effort? Rehabilitation Causes and Outcomes and the Assessment of Post-Release Survival for Urban Wild Bird Admissions in a European Metropolis.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- B-Mode Ultrasound Diagnostics of Orthopaedic Diseases in Clinical Avian Medicine: Comparative Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Survival Prospects of Wild Birds Depending on the Type of Injury and Other Stressors Leading to Hospitalisation: A Long-Term (1988-2020) Retrospective Study from an Urbanised Area of the Alps.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- The Avian-RUM Block: A Locoregional Technique for Distal Wing Procedures in Birds-An Anatomical Cadaveric Feasibility Study with a Clinical Illustration.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Easy rescues, difficult decisions: Advancing the ethical dialogue in wildlife triage, treatment and rehabilitation.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Globally, millions of wild birds are admitted to rehabilitation centres each year. We analysed data on wild bird admissions at an urban rehabilitation centre in Berlin, Germany, collected over 20 years (2005-2024), aiming to (a) characterise admission causes and demographics, (b) investigate the rehabilitation duration and release probability across admission causes and systematic bird groups, and (c) assess post-release survival as a proxy for rehabilitation success. Longer rehabilitation durations were generally associated with orphaned birds and those in poor condition or who had had an infection. Orphans and birds with undetermined admission causes were most likely to be released. Birds that were admitted in poor condition were least likely to be released, which was particularly the case among Passerines. The monitoring of post-release survival through ring recovery data revealed higher recovery rates for larger birds but no informative value on post-release survival across species; thus, it did not represent an ideal measure of rehabilitation success in terms of the original objective. We conclude that the extent, outcome, and success of wild bird rehabilitation may depend on the initial cause of admission and may differ between bird groups. Advanced measures to assess post-release survival should be considered to allocate the limited resources and the conservation efforts of wild bird rehabilitation centres to birds of species and/or admission causes best suited to undergoing rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.