ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Histopathological Assessment and In Ovo Vaccination Response to IBD and ND in Broiler Chickens.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infectious bursal disease (IBD) is a viral disease that most commonly affects young chickens and destroys lymphocytes, leading to immunosuppression. The field study aimed to investigate the effect of three different vaccines administered in ovo against IBD and spray against Newcastle disease (ND) on serological response tested for IBD and ND and histopathological analysis of the bursa of Fabricius (BF) and quantitative B lymphocytes in BF in broiler chickens. The study was conducted on a farm of four hen houses with 30,000 chicks in each building. Three different vaccination programs were used in the poultry hatchery, and one hen house IV was not vaccinated. All three groups were vaccinated at 18 days and 9 h in ovo during egg transfer against IBD at a dose of 0.05 mL/embryo, group I vector vaccine (strain vHVT013-69), group II immunocomplex vaccine (strain Winterfield 2512), group III immunocomplex vaccine (strain M.B, 0.05). Then, after hatching, the chicks were vaccinated in a spray (groups I, II, and III) against NDV (strain VG/GA, 20 mL/100 birds) and infectious bronchitis (IBV) in a spray (strain H-120, serotype Mass, and strain CR88121, serotype 793B) at a dose of 20 mL/100 chicks. On days 1, 21, 31, and 41, blood was collected for serological tests to determine the antibody titer against IBD, which was performed using two tests (IDEXX and ID-Vet) and against ND. During the necropsy of birds on days 21 and 31, the bursae of Fabricius were collected from five chickens for histopathological evaluation of BF and quantitative B lymphocyte counts; a total of 40 bursae were analyzed (10 per group). The vaccination program applied significantly (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.