ReviewBiomedicines2025
The Overlapping Biology of Sepsis and Cancer and Therapeutic Implications.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial-based cancer therapy: mechanisms and therapeutic advances.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Immune-driven induction of miR-501-5p by IL-17A enhances colorectal cancer progression.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Convergent immune dysregulation in sepsis and colorectal cancer highlights plasma cells and identifies shared candidate genes.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- LDHA, BIK, and CNIH4 Are Diagnostic Markers of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Lung Cancer Comorbid With Sepsis: Integrating Machine Learning and Single-Cell Analysis of Immune Signaling.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
- Lymphocyte function inhibition and exhaustion in sepsis: mechanisms and applications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Association between sepsis and all-cause and cause-specific premature mortality: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis and cancer, though distinct in their clinical manifestations, share profound pathophysiological overlaps that underscore their interconnectedness in disease progression and outcomes. Here we discuss the intricate biological mechanisms linking these two conditions, focusing on the roles of inflammation, immune dysregulation, and metabolic alterations. In sepsis, an uncontrolled immune response to infection leads to a cytokine storm, tissue damage, and immune paralysis, while cancer exploits chronic inflammation and immunosuppressive pathways to promote tumor growth and metastasis. Both conditions exhibit metabolic reprogramming, such as the Warburg effect in cancer and glycolysis-driven immune cell activation in sepsis, which fuels disease progression and complicates treatment. Sepsis can exacerbate cancer progression by inducing genomic instability, epigenetic modifications, and a pro-tumorigenic microenvironment, while cancer increases susceptibility to sepsis through immunosuppression and treatment-related complications. The shared pathways between sepsis and cancer present unique opportunities for therapeutic intervention, including anti-inflammatory agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and metabolic modulators. Anti-inflammatory therapies, such as IL-6 and TNF-α inhibitors, show promise in mitigating inflammation, while immune checkpoint inhibitors like anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies are being explored to restore immune function in sepsis and enhance antitumor immunity in cancer. Metabolic modulators, including glycolysis and glutaminolysis inhibitors, target the metabolic reprogramming common to both conditions, though their dual roles in normal and pathological processes necessitate careful consideration. Additionally, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a versatile therapeutic option with their dual antimicrobial and antitumor properties. In this review, we also highlight the critical need for integrated approaches to understanding and managing the complex interactions between sepsis and cancer. By bridging the gap between sepsis and cancer research, this work aims to inspire interdisciplinary collaboration and advance the development of targeted therapies that address the shared mechanisms driving these devastating diseases. Ultimately, these insights may pave the way for novel diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies to improve outcomes for patients affected by both conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.