ReviewBiology2025
The Plantaris Muscle Is Not Vestigial: Developmental, Comparative, and Functional Evidence for Its Sensorimotor Role.
Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plantaris tendon morphology in Papio anubis: a comparative anatomical study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Vascular and Neural Compression Syndromes Associated with Plantaris Muscle Variants: A Classification-Based Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Bilateral Accessory Plantaris Muscles With Variant Origins and Insertions: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Comparative Anatomy of the Coracobrachialis Muscle: Insights into Human Typical and Variant Morphology.Biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The functional status of the plantaris muscle (PM) remains controversial and is historically dismissed as vestigial; yet, it is increasingly recognized for its structural and clinical complexity. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence from embryological development, adult morphological studies, comparative mammalian anatomy, and clinical case reports to reassess the role of the PM in humans. Developmental data reveal that the PM is consistently present during fetal life, with tendon morphology and insertion patterns emerging early and resembling adult anatomical variants. Rather than indicating postnatal regression, it suggests a stable polymorphism rooted in prenatal development. Across mammalian species, the PM varies in presence and function, correlating with locomotor specialization from proprioception in primates to propulsion in carnivores, and absence in ungulates. In humans, high proprioceptive fiber density and anatomical variability support the hypothesis that the PM may be undergoing functional repurposing from a contractile to a sensorimotor role. Clinically, its relevance is evident in imaging interpretation, surgical tendon harvesting, and the pathophysiology of Achilles tendinopathy. Recent discoveries, including the identification of the plantaris ligamentous tendon (PLT), further underscore the complexity of this region and support the need to reassess its structural and clinical significance. We conclude that the PM should not be regarded as a regressing remnant but as a dynamically adapting structure with potential neuromechanical function. Future studies involving electromyography and neuroanatomical mapping are essential to elucidate its evolving role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.