Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40563937›Full record

ArticleBiology2025

Luminex MFI-Efforts from a Qualitative to a Quantitative Analysis.

Thomas Schacker, Ramona Landgraf, Ilias Doxiadis, Henry Loeffler-Wirth, Claudia Lehmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas SchackerInterdisciplinary Centre for Bioinformatics, IZBI, Leipzig University, 04107 Leipzig, Germany.
Ramona LandgrafLaboratory for Transplantation Immunology, Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Ilias DoxiadisLaboratory for Transplantation Immunology, Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Henry Loeffler-WirthInterdisciplinary Centre for Bioinformatics, IZBI, Leipzig University, 04107 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8239-440X
Claudia LehmannLaboratory for Transplantation Immunology, Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2791-764X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Luminex multiplex assay for the definition of HLA antibodies was introduced 20 years ago. To date, although the assay is simple and straightforward, the interpretation of the results remains a conundrum. Making use of the so-called mean fluorescence value only does not help since this value is relative, the day-to-day variation is significantly large, and the user variation is beyond acceptable ranges. Within the same range of problems, the cutoff value used to classify HLA-specific antibodies as being either present or absent varies between laboratories. This threshold influences clinical decision-making. In addition, the readout value is used to diagnose the amount of HLA-specific antibodies after treatments like absorption, plasmapheresis, or transplantation, overlooking the relative nature of the value. In this study, we show bead variability for HLA class I and HLA class II based on negatively defined bead reactions with a mean fluorescence value below 1500 and self-antigens. In an effort to circumvent the assay's inherent problems, we introduced the term ratio. For each serum sample, a paired sample from before the treatment is run in parallel. The ratio of post-treatment to pre-treatment can then be used to characterize antibody dynamics: a ratio above 1 reflects increased antibody production and a ratio below 1 indicates a decrease in antibodies in the serum. This value may offer the possibility to make more informed and adaptive treatment decisions.

Indexed as

bead-based solid phasebead variabilityHLA antibodiesLuminexMFIratio

Identifiers

PMID40563937
PMCPMC12189511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.