ReviewBiology2025
AI-Driven Transcriptome Prediction in Human Pathology: From Molecular Insights to Clinical Applications.
Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI-guided meta-analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing platforms for trisomy 21 screening: comparative evaluation of cffDNA and fetal cell-based approaches.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Special Issue "Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure-2025".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence as a Discovery Engine for Routine Molecular Techniques: Extracting Biological Insight from Western Blotting, ELISA, Immunostaining, and Immunoprecipitation.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Mechanism-aware and safety-validated AI for drug repurposing: a critical review and translational pharmacology framework.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Next generation sequencing and beyond: a review of genomic sequencing methods.Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
- CRISPR and Artificial Intelligence in Neuroregeneration: Closed-Loop Strategies for Precision Medicine, Spinal Cord Repair, and Adaptive Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Special Issue "25 Anniversary of Bioinformatics of Genome Regulation and Structure Conference Series".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- New Sights into Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene expression regulation underpins cellular function and disease progression, yet its complexity and the limitations of conventional detection methods hinder clinical translation. In this review, we define "predict" as the AI-driven inference of gene expression levels and regulatory mechanisms from non-invasive multimodal data (e.g., histopathology images, genomic sequences, and electronic health records) instead of direct molecular assays. We systematically examine and analyze the current approaches for predicting gene expression and diagnosing diseases, highlighting their respective advantages and limitations. Machine learning algorithms and deep learning models excel in extracting meaningful features from diverse biomedical modalities, enabling tools like PathChat and Prov-GigaPath to improve cancer subtyping, therapy response prediction, and biomarker discovery. Despite significant progress, persistent challenges-such as data heterogeneity, noise, and ethical issues including privacy and algorithmic bias-still limit broad clinical adoption. Emerging solutions like cross-modal pretraining frameworks, federated learning, and fairness-aware model design aim to overcome these barriers. Case studies in precision oncology illustrate AI's ability to decode tumor ecosystems and predict treatment outcomes. By harmonizing multimodal data and advancing ethical AI practices, this field holds immense potential to propel personalized medicine forward, although further innovation is needed to address the issues of scalability, interpretability, and equitable deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.