ArticleBrain sciences2025
Flow-Diverting Stents During Mechanical Thrombectomy for Carotid Artery Dissection-Related Stroke: Analysis from a Multicentre Cohort.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeMechanical thrombectomy in the context of internal carotid artery dissection (ICA-D) lesions is an undesirable procedure that may necessitate carotid stenting. Flow-diverting stents (FDSs) are promising devices with numerous advantages, particularly in cases involving tortuous anatomy. Here, we investigate the use of FDSs in the acute management of carotid dissection during mechanical thrombectomy procedures in patients with dissection-related strokes. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a multicentric retrospective observational study of consecutive patients admitted for mechanical thrombectomy due to acute ischaemic stroke with ICA-D and treated with an FDS in the acute setting between July 2018 and February 2023. Patient records, procedural details, and post-procedural outcomes, including follow-up data, were reviewed.
resultsA total of 11 patients (10 patients with unilateral ICA-D and one patient with bilateral ICA-D) were included, 10 of whom were male, with a median age of 54 years (range: 35-85 years) and NIHSS scores at admission ranging from 3 to 32 (median 13). Eight cases (73%) involved intracranial occlusion (tandem stroke), with the intracranial occlusion managed first each time. An FDS was selected when the dissection was long and/or the ICA was tortuous, and successful deployment was achieved in all patients with a favourable angiographic outcome (TICI 2B-3). A favourable outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-2 at 90 days) was observed in five patients (45%), with four patients (36%) experiencing symptomatic ICH and three patients having stent occlusion out of the 12 treated ICA-D cases.
conclusionsThe use of FDSs for acute stenting in ICA-D-related stroke can be performed efficiently, resulting in excellent angiographic outcomes and an acceptable rate of favourable outcomes specific to the pathology. Larger prospective studies are still needed to confirm the potential benefits of FDSs in acute situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.