ReviewBrain sciences2025
Rapid Eye Movements in Sleep Furnish a Unique Probe into the Ontogenetic and Phylogenetic Development of the Visual Brain: Implications for Autism Research.
Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With positron emission tomography followed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we demonstrated that rapid eye movements (REMs) in sleep are saccades that scan dream imagery. The brain "sees" essentially the same way while awake and while dreaming in REM sleep. As expected, an event-related fMRI study (events = REMs) showed activation time-locked to REMs in sleep ("REM-locked" activation) in the oculomotor circuit that controls saccadic eye movements and visual attention. More crucially, the fMRI study provided a series of unexpected findings, including REM-locked multisensory integration. REMs in sleep index the processing of endogenous visual information and the hierarchical generation of dream imagery through multisensory integration. The neural processes concurrent with REMs overlap extensively with those reported to be atypical in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Studies on ASD have shown atypical visual processing and multisensory integration, emerging early in infancy and subsequently developing into autistic symptoms. MRI studies of infants at high risk for ASD are typically conducted during natural sleep. Simply timing REMs may improve the accuracy of early detection and identify markers for stratification in heterogeneous ASD patients. REMs serve as a task-free probe useful for studying both infants and animals, who cannot comply with conventional visual activation tasks. Note that REM-probe studies would be easier to implement in early infancy because REM sleep, which is markedly preponderant in the last trimester of pregnancy, is still pronounced in early infancy. The brain may practice seeing the world during REM sleep in utero before birth. The REM-probe controls the level of attention across both the lifespan and typical-atypical neurodevelopment. Longitudinal REM-probe studies may elucidate how the brain develops the ability to "see" and how this goes awry in autism. REMs in sleep may allow a straightforward comparison of animal and human data. REM-probe studies of animal models of autism have great potential. This narrative review puts forth every reason to believe that employing REMs as a probe into the development of the visual brain will have far-reaching implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.