ArticleBrain sciences2025
Screening for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Good IDEA?
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) remains under-recognized in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), in part due to the lack of validated cognitive screening tools adapted to low-literacy populations. We aimed to validate the Identification of Dementia in Elderly Africans (IDEA) cognitive screen in SSA and assess its utility for detecting PSCI in Guinea and Cameroon.
methodsNormative IDEA scores were derived from a control cohort of healthy older adults in Conakry (Guinea) and Bafoussam (Cameroon). The tool was then applied to consecutive stroke patients from the same hospitals within one month of stroke onset. Demographic, clinical, and vascular risk profiles were collected. Between-group comparisons were performed using Welch's
resultsAmong 91 healthy controls (median age: 64), the mean IDEA score was 12 ± 2.4. A cut-off of ≤7 (2 standard deviations below the mean) was defined for cognitive impairment. Among 111 stroke patients (median age: 65; mean NIHSS: 9.9 ± 5.8), the mean IDEA score was 9.6 ± 3.2, and 31 patients (28%) had scores ≤ 7. Stroke patients had significantly higher rates of hypertension and diabetes compared to controls.
conclusionsThe IDEA screen appears to be a feasible and effective tool for detecting PSCI in SSA clinical settings. The 28% prevalence of cognitive impairment aligns with data from high-income countries, supporting the broader use of the IDEA to strengthen cognitive care pathways in SSA stroke populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.