ReviewCancers2025
Fluorescence Guidance in Glioma Surgery: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and the Drive Towards Objective Margin Differentiation.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fluorescence-guided versus non-fluorescence-guided resection in high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival outcomes.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Multidisciplinary consensus recommendations for the management of IDH-mutant grade 2 gliomas in Spain: a Delphi study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Contrast-enhancement-defined resection outcomes with sodium fluorescein and 5-aminolevulinic acid in glioblastoma surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort of 1389 patients.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Observational
- Tunable Technologies for the Glioma Tumor Microenvironment: A Comprehensive Review on Bench-to-Bedside Neurosurgical Advances.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Emerging In Vivo Imaging Modalities for Improved Glioblastoma Surgery and Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Glioblastoma-A Contemporary Overview of Epidemiology, Classification, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment: A Review Article.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) was pioneered for glioma and is now established as the standard of care. Gliomas are infiltrative tumours with diffuse margins. FGS provides improved intra-operative identification of tumour margins based on tumour-specific emission visible to the operating surgeon, resulting in increased rates of gross total resection. Multiple fluorescence agents may be used including 5-ALA, fluorescein sodium, and indocyanine green (ICG). This review details the indication, required equipment, mechanism of action, evidence base, limitations, and regulatory issues for each fluorophore as utilised in current clinical practice. FGS for glioma is limited by a reliance on subjective interpretation of visible fluorescence, which is often not present in low-grade glioma (LGG) or at the infiltrative tumour margin. Consequently, there has been a drive to develop enhanced, objective FGS techniques utilising both quantitative fluorescence (QF) imaging systems and novel fluorophores. This review provides an overview of emerging QF imaging systems for FGS. The pipeline for novel fluorophore development is also summarised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.