ReviewCancers2025
Blood-Based Biomarkers as Predictive and Prognostic Factors in Immunotherapy-Treated Patients with Solid Tumors-Currents and Perspectives.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Associations of three immune inflammatory markers with the risk of brain metastasis from lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Plasma proteomics predicts pathological complete response and reveals LIF as a potential mediator of resistance to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in resectable NSCLC.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Plasma proteomics-based liquid biopsy for predicting efficacy of PD-1-based immunochemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a prospective cohort study.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Article
- CirculatingCancers · 2026Article
- Peripheral blood biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy: distinguishing predictive from prognostic biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer: advancing in precision diagnosis and clinical management.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Genomic innovations in cancer prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and precision therapeutics.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Clinicopathological and preoperative biomarkers associated with recurrence after primary surgical treatment for endometrial cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Immune monitoring for relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in clinical laboratories.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Distinct Metabolomic and Lipoprotein Signatures in Gall Bladder Cancer Patients of Black African Ancestry.Cancers · 2025Article
- Optimizing early-phase immunotherapy trials: the role of biomarker enrichment strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Lactylation and antitumor immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Innate immunity in tumors: roles and therapeutic targets.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment; however, the availability of cost-effective blood-based biomarkers for prognostic and predictive factors of immune treatment in patients with solid tumors remains limited. Due to low cost and easy accessibility, blood-based biomarkers should constitute an essential component of studies to optimize and monitor immunotherapy. Currently available markers that can be measured in peripheral blood include total monocyte count, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), regulatory T cells (Tregs), relative eosinophil count, cytokine levels (such as IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), soluble forms of CTLA-4 and PD-1 or PD-L1, as well as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). In our mini-review, we discuss the latest evidence indicating that routinely accessible peripheral blood parameters-such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and rheological parameters, which so far have been rarely considered for such an application, may be used as non-invasive biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy. Rheological parameters such as whole blood viscosity are influenced by several factors, such as hematocrit, aggregability and deformability of erythrocytes, and plasma viscosity, which is largely dependent on plasma proteins. Especially in cases where the set of symptoms indicates a high probability of hyperviscosity syndrome, blood rheological tests can lead to early diagnosis and treatment. Both biochemical and rheological parameters are prone to become novel and future standards for assessing immunotherapy among patients with solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.