ReviewCancers2025
Cryoablation and Intratumoral Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Future Path to Cost-Effective De-Escalation for Larger Tumors, Lymph Nodes and Metastatic Disease.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Cryoablation in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety and Oncologic Outcomes.Cancers · 2026Review
- Cryoablation Plus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Enhanced Dendritic Cell and T Cell Activation in TNBC Murine Model.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cryoablation is a promising, cost-effective option to de-escalate surgical breast cancer morbidity, but presently is only suggested for breast cancers < 1.5 cm, in select candidates. Breast cancer cryoablation is not a reliably covered procedure by insurance and is mainly guided by ultrasound (US), using a single cryoprobe. Yet, cryoablation is an accepted treatment option for various malignancies, including those of the kidney, liver and lung, utilizing a predominantly CT-guided, multi-probe approach using crucial cytotoxic isotherms for thorough tumor coverage. Cryoablation thus continues to find new clinical utility and is rapidly advancing on multiple fronts, similar to immunotherapy. Clinical concerns of expanding cryoablation to breast tumors > 1.5 cm is more related to the greater risk of metastatic spread to local lymph nodes and beyond. Combined adjuvant treatment, such as radiation and/or chemotherapy, are currently used for regional and systemic breast cancer control, but have significant associated morbidities. US/CT-guided multi-probe large-volume breast cryoablation is presented as a thorough local control option for select patients. Intratumoral chemotherapy by direct tumor injection has been shown to be safe and is currently being tested with immunotherapy drugs and exhibits much lower morbidity. Cryoablation combined with intratumoral immunotherapy is presented to show robust systemic immune response and the potential to provide additional protection from regional and/or metastatic disease spread while de-escalating the morbidities from current adjuvant treatments for larger breast cancers. While further clinical trials are needed, it is essential to pursue safe and effective breast cancer treatments that offer the potential for cost-efficiency and therapeutic de-escalation across a wide spectrum of breast cancer cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.