ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
Streamlining the annotation process by radiologists of volumetric medical images with few-shot learning.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRadiologist's manual annotations limit robust deep learning in volumetric medical imaging. While supervised methods excel with large annotated datasets, few-shot learning performs well for large structures but struggles with small ones, such as lesions. This paper describes a novel method that leverages the advantages of both few-shot learning models and fully supervised models while reducing the cost of manual annotation.
methodsOur method inputs a small dataset of labeled scans and a large dataset of unlabeled scans and outputs a validated labeled dataset used to train a supervised model (nnU-Net). The estimated correction effort is reduced by having the radiologist correct a subset of the scan labels computed by a few-shot learning model (UniverSeg). The method uses an optimized support set of scan slice patches and prioritizes the resulting labeled scans that require the least correction. This process is repeated for the remaining unannotated scans until satisfactory performance is obtained.
resultsWe validated our method on liver, lung, and brain lesions on CT and MRI scans (375 scans, 5933 lesions). It significantly reduces the estimated lesion detection correction effort by 34% for missed lesions, 387% for wrongly identified lesions, with 130% fewer lesion contour corrections, and 424% fewer pixels to correct in the lesion contours with respect to manual annotation from scratch.
conclusionOur method effectively reduces the radiologist's annotation effort of small structures to produce sufficient high-quality annotated datasets to train deep learning models. The method is generic and can be applied to a variety of lesions in various organs imaged by different modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.