ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Impact of proton versus photon radiotherapy on overall survival in the management of spinal chordoma and mortality risk prediction: a nationwide analysis.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to provide a national-level insight into the optimal management of spinal chordoma, a type of rare and complicated malignancy, and to identify effective radiation therapy (RT) strategies for patients with spinal chordoma by comparing photon versus proton therapies.
methodsPatients with histologically confirmed spinal chordoma were identified from the NCDB. Patients' demographics, disease characteristics and treatments were compared between the radiation and no-radiation groups. Kaplan-Meier assessed 10-year overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox regression and machine learning models-Random Survival Forest and Gradient Boosting-identified predictive factors and thresholds of tumor size for mortality risk, with SHAP used to quantify predictor importance.
resultsOf 1204 patients, 495 (41.1%) received RT; 73.9% received photons and 26.1% protons. GTR significantly improved OS compared to STR (p < 0.0001). RT was associated with reduced short-term morality at 90-days (p = 0.025) and 1-year (p = 0.016). Proton therapy showed superior 10-year OS compared to photon therapy (p = 0.019). Beam technology, BED dose, sequence, and reirradiation had minimal impact on OS. Cox regression identified age (HR = 1.03, p < 0.001), STR (HR = 1.42, p = 0.005), and proton therapy (HR = 0.58, p = 0.044) as independent mortality predictors. Machine learning identified tumor size thresholds (photons: 83 mm; protons: 70 mm) and ranked age, tumor size, and EOR as top survival predictors.
conclusionAggressive surgical resection (GTR) remains the primary treatment for spinal chordoma. Proton therapy that allows for dose escalation provided 10-year survival benefits compared to photon therapy. Age, tumor size and EOR are important factors in predicting 10-year mortality risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40563064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.