ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Machine Learning-Based Risk Assessment of Myasthenia Gravis Onset in Thymoma Patients and Analysis of Their Correlations and Causal Relationships.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study aims to utilize interpretable machine learning models to predict the risk of myasthenia gravis onset in thymoma patients and investigate the intrinsic correlations and causal relationships between them. A comprehensive retrospective analysis was conducted on 172 thymoma patients diagnosed at two medical centers between 2018 and 2024. The cohort was bifurcated into a training set (n = 134) and test set (n = 38) to develop and validate risk predictive models. Radiomic and deep features were extracted from tumor regions across three CT phases: non-enhanced, arterial, and venous. Through rigorous feature selection employing Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) regularization, 12 optimal imaging features were identified. These were integrated with 11 clinical parameters and one pathological subtype variable to form a multi-dimensional feature matrix. Six machine learning algorithms were subsequently implemented for model construction and comparative analysis. We utilized SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanation) to interpret the model and employed doubly robust learner to perform a potential causal analysis between thymoma and myasthenia gravis (MG). All six models demonstrated satisfactory predictive capabilities, with the support vector machine (SVM) model exhibiting superior performance on the test cohort. It achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.904 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.798-1.000), outperforming other models such as logistic regression, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and others. The model's predictive result substantiates the strong correlation between thymoma and MG. Additionally, our analysis revealed the existence of a significant causal relationship between them, and high-risk tumors significantly elevated the risk of MG by an average treatment effect (ATE) of 9.2%. This implies that thymoma patients with types B2 and B3 face a considerably high risk of developing MG compared to those with types A, AB, and B1. The model provides a novel and effective tool for evaluating the risk of MG development in patients with thymoma. Furthermore, correlation and causal analysis have unveiled pathways that connect tumor to the risk of MG, with a notably higher incidence of MG observed in high risk pathological subtypes. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of MG and drive a paradigm shift in medical practice from passive treatment to proactive intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.