ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
An Unsupervised Brain Extraction Quality Control Approach for Efficient Neuro-Oncology Studies.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain extraction is essential in neuroimaging studies for patient privacy and optimizing computational analyses. Manual creation of 3D brain masks is labor-intensive, prompting the development of automatic computational methods. Robust quality control (QC) is hence necessary for the effective use of these methods in large-scale studies. However, previous automated QC methods have been limited in flexibility regarding algorithmic architecture and data adaptability. We introduce a novel approach inspired by a statistical outlier detection paradigm to efficiently identify potentially erroneous data. Our QC method is unsupervised, resource-efficient, and requires minimal parameter tuning. We quantitatively evaluated its performance using morphological features of brain masks generated from three automated brain extraction tools across multi-institutional pre- and post-operative brain glioblastoma MRI scans. We achieved an accuracy of 0.9 for pre- and 0.87 for post-operative scans, thus demonstrating the effectiveness of our proposed QC tool for brain extraction. Additionally, the method shows potential for other tasks where a user-defined feature space can be defined. Our novel QC approach offers significant improvements in flexibility and efficiency over previous methods. It is a valuable tool, targeting reassurance of brain masks in neuroimaging and can be adapted for other applications requiring robust QC mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.