ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Few-Shot Learning for Prostate Cancer Detection on MRI: Comparative Analysis with Radiologists' Performance.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated Prostate Cancer Detection on T2-Weighted MRI Using a Dual-Stream Attention Network: A Study on Private Saudi Clinical Data and Public Benchmark Datasets.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep-learning models for prostate cancer detection typically require large datasets, limiting clinical applicability across institutions due to domain shift issues. This study aimed to develop a few-shot learning deep-learning model for prostate cancer detection on multiparametric MRI that requires minimal training data and to compare its diagnostic performance with experienced radiologists. In this retrospective study, we used 99 cases (80 positive, 19 negative) of biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer (2017-2022), with 20 cases for training, 5 for validation, and 74 for testing. A 2D transformer model was trained on T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and apparent diffusion coefficient map images. Model predictions were compared with two radiologists using Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) and F1 score, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated via bootstrap method. The model achieved an MCC of 0.297 (95% CI: 0.095-0.474) and F1 score of 0.707 (95% CI: 0.598-0.847). Radiologist 1 had an MCC of 0.276 (95% CI: 0.054-0.484) and F1 score of 0.741; Radiologist 2 had an MCC of 0.504 (95% CI: 0.289-0.703) and F1 score of 0.871, showing that the model performance was comparable to Radiologist 1. External validation on the Prostate158 dataset revealed that ImageNet pretraining substantially improved model performance, increasing study-level ROC-AUC from 0.464 to 0.636 and study-level PR-AUC from 0.637 to 0.773 across all architectures. Our findings demonstrate that few-shot deep-learning models can achieve clinically relevant performance when using pretrained transformer architectures, offering a promising approach to address domain shift challenges across institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.