ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Efficacy of an Automated Pulmonary Embolism (PE) Detection Algorithm on Routine Contrast-Enhanced Chest CT Imaging for Non-PE Studies.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The urgency to accelerate PE management and minimize patient risk has driven the development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms designed to provide a swift and accurate diagnosis in dedicated chest imaging (computed tomography pulmonary angiogram; CTPA) for suspected PE; however, the accuracy of AI algorithms in the detection of incidental PE in non-dedicated CT imaging studies remains unclear and untested. This study explores the potential for a commercial AI algorithm to identify incidental PE in non-dedicated contrast-enhanced CT chest imaging studies. The Viz PE algorithm was deployed to identify the presence of PE on 130 dedicated and 63 non-dedicated contrast-enhanced CT chest exams. The predictions for non-dedicated contrast-enhanced chest CT imaging studies were 90.48% accurate, with a sensitivity of 0.14 and specificity of 1.00. Our findings reflect that the Viz PE algorithm demonstrated an overall accuracy of 90.16%, with a specificity of 96% and a sensitivity of 41%. Although the high specificity is promising for ruling in PE, the low sensitivity highlights a limitation, as it indicates the algorithm may miss a substantial number of true-positive incidental PEs. This study demonstrates that commercial AI detection tools hold promise as integral support for detecting PE, particularly when there is a strong clinical indication for their use; however, current limitations in sensitivity, especially for incidental cases, underscore the need for ongoing radiologist oversight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.