Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40563022›Full record

ReviewBiologia futura2025

Dogs as a model to study the emergence of concept manipulation skills for language-readiness.

Dorottya S Rácz, Marianna Boros, Attila Andics

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biologia futura, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dorottya S RáczNeuroethology of Communication Lab, Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. dorottyaszilviaracz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1957-2281
Marianna Boros *Neuroethology of Communication Lab, Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila Andics *Neuroethology of Communication Lab, Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 950159Magyar Tudományos Akadémia NAP2022- 35 I-3/2022University Excellence Scholarship Program EKÖP-24-3-I-ELTE-58
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language-readiness entails the ability to segment holistic events into discrete concepts, learn signals for such concepts, and combine them in a rule-based manner to create composite meanings. There is much debate about whether, and to what extent, the brain mechanisms that enable concept manipulation abilities in humans are unmatched in the animal kingdom. Challenging human-uniqueness theories, we propose a social cognition-mediation account hypothesizing that concept manipulation abilities essential for language-readiness could also emerge in other species with a sufficient level of certain prerequisite social-cognitive skills, namely goal-representation, intentionality-attribution, and mentalization. We argue for the involvement of a new species in comparative studies on language evolution to evaluate this hypothesis: the domestic dog, a species that has undergone selective pressures for prosociality during domestication similar to those experienced by early humans, as well as shows a natural propensity to communicate their experiences. As a consequence, dogs may possess the necessary social-cognitive capacities to develop concept manipulation skills. Dogs' concept manipulation abilities have never been systematically investigated, nor directly compared to those of humans. Capitalizing on recent advances in comparative non-invasive neuroimaging and behavioural measures, here we propose feasible, promising experimental approaches for such investigations.

Indexed as

Concept FormationLanguageAnimalsCognitionDogsHumansDogEvent perceptionLanguage evolutionSocial-cognitive skillsSymbolic capacitiesSyntactic abilities

Identifiers

PMID40563022
PMCPMC12367953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.