Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40562978›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025

Increasing airflow ventilation in a nasal maxillary ostium using optimised shape and pulsating flows.

Patrick Warfield-McAlpine, David F Fletcher, Fiona Zhang, Kiao Inthavong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick Warfield-McAlpineDepartment of Mechanical Manufacturing Mechatronic Engineering, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.
David F FletcherSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Fiona ZhangDepartment of Mechanical Manufacturing Mechatronic Engineering, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.
Kiao InthavongDepartment of Mechanical Manufacturing Mechatronic Engineering, RMIT University, PO Box 71, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia. kiao.inthavong@rmit.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ventilation of the maxillary sinus is essential for regulating pressure, preventing infection and providing mucous to the nasal anatomy. During infection, the pathway between the sinus and the nasal airway (ostia) can become inflamed and restrict ventilation. Surgery is often required to restore airflow. The current surgical standard involves the widening of the ostium. Although this restores fluid flow, it has been linked to post-surgical sequelae. This study examined the effects of pulsating flow and geometric modifications on airflow distribution in a T-junction model analogous to a nasal maxillary ostium. A circular T-junction with variable anterior and posterior radius of curvature (

Indexed as

Maxillary SinusNasal CavityPulmonary VentilationPulsatile FlowRespirationComputer SimulationHumansHydrodynamicsModels, BiologicalCFDLaminarNasal airwayPulsating flowT-junction

Identifiers

PMID40562978
PMCPMC12246003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.